Flexible Pathways to Demonstrating Learning: British Columbia Online Educators' Perspectives on Inclusive Assessment Practice

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57125/ELIJ.2026.09.25.03

Keywords:

inclusive assessment, online learning, authentic assessment, student agency, teacher–student relationships.

Abstract

Assessment plays an essential role in supporting participation in K–12 online learning, yet little research has examined how the capabilities and constraints of digital learning environments shape the assessment practices educators use to support diverse learners. This study explored how British Columbia K–12 online educators leverage these capabilities to design inclusive assessment practices that enable meaningful demonstrations of learning. Data were collected from 86 educators working in online and blended learning environments through a mixed-methods survey comprising open-ended and Likert-scale items. Qualitative responses were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, and conceptually aligned survey items were analysed descriptively to complement and strengthen the interpretation of the qualitative findings. The findings identified three interconnected dimensions of inclusive assessment. First, educators emphasised flexibility and responsiveness, providing a variety of assessment formats, student choice, individualised adaptations, and varied pathways for demonstrating learning. Second, educators described strengths-based and authentic assessment through inquiry, project-based learning, real-world applications, and opportunities for students to build on their interests and capabilities. Third, participants emphasised relational assessment: ongoing teacher–student dialogue, conferencing, and responsive feedback were seen as essential for understanding learner strengths and informing assessment decisions. Quantitative findings reinforced these themes. Sixty-nine per cent of educators reported frequently or very frequently understanding learner and family contexts, 63% recognising learner strengths, and 59% having resources that supported multiple pathways for demonstrating learning. The integrated findings informed a conceptual framework proposing that flexibility, authenticity, and relationships operate together to create meaningful demonstrations of learning in online environments. The framework contributes a foundation for future research, teacher education, professional learning, and policy development aimed at strengthening inclusive assessment in K–12 online learning.

References

Ahmed, M. R., & Sidiq, M. A. (2023). Evaluating online assessment strategies: A systematic review of reliability and validity in e-learning environments. North American Academic Research, 6(12), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10407361

Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587

Arnold, J., & Willis, J. (2024). From fragmentation to coherence: Student experience of assessment for learning. Australian Educational Researcher, 51(5), 1849–1875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00668-y

Bennett, R. E. (2023). Toward a theory of socioculturally responsive assessment. Educational Assessment, 28(2), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2023.2202312

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.

Calandri, E., Mastrokoukou, S., Marchisio, C., Monchietto, A., & Graziano, F. (2025). Teacher emotional competence for inclusive education: A systematic review. Behavioral Sciences, 15(3), Article 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030359

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2025). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.

Damaševičius, R., & Sidekerskienė, T. (2024). Virtual worlds for learning in metaverse: A narrative review. Sustainability, 16(5), Article 2032. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16052032

Fleming, E. C. (2023). UDL for inclusive teaching: Offering choice to increase belonging through technology. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.14434/jotlt.v12i1.36327

Gibson, P., Clarkson, R., & Scott, M. (2022). Promoting potential through purposeful inclusive assessment for distance learners. Distance Education, 43(4), 543–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2022.2143321

González, M. A., Santos, B. S. N., Vargas, A. R., Martín-Gutiérrez, J., & Orihuela, A. R. (2013). Virtual worlds: Opportunities and challenges in the 21st century. Procedia Computer Science, 25, 330–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.11.039

Kilbane, C. R., & Milman, N. B. (2017). Examining the impact of the creation of digital portfolios by high school teachers and their students on teaching and learning. International Journal of ePortfolio, 7(1), 101–109.

Kurth, J. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Roberts, C. A., & Turner, E. L. (2021). Traditional and innovative assessment techniques for students with extensive support needs. In J. P. Bakken & F. E. Obiakor (Eds.), Traditional and innovative assessment techniques for students with disabilities (Vol. 36). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0270-401320210000036008

Levy-Feldman, I. (2025). The role of assessment in improving education and promoting educational equity. Education Sciences, 15(2), Article 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020224

Lim, T., Gottipati, S., Cheong, M., Ng, J. W., & Pang, C. (2023). Analytics-enabled authentic assessment design approach for digital education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 9025–9048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11525-3

Lowenthal, P. R., Greear, K., Humphrey, M., Lowenthal, A., Conley, Q., Giacumo, L. A., & Dunlap, J. C. (2020). Creating accessible and inclusive online learning: Moving beyond compliance and broadening the discussion. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 21(2), 1–82.

Lucas, B. (2022). Rethinking assessment in schools: Moving from a deficit to a strengths-based model. The Psychology of Education Review, 46(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsper.2022.46.1.5

Machkour, M., Lamalif, L., Faris, S., Mansouri, K., & Akef, F. (2025). Rethinking the integration of ICT in education: Towards a communication model to promote sustainable development. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 601, Article 00097). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202560100097

Sabil, H., Kurniawan, D. A., Perdana, R., Nawahdani, A. M., & Widodi, B. (2023). Students' learning interest using web-based assessment at the elementary school level. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 7(4), 632–640. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v7i4.59737

Short, C. R., Sapp, T., & Haniya, S. (2026). Assessment in K-12 online learning contexts. Journal of Online Learning Research, 12(1), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.70725/989205vlbqvl

Slee, R. (2018). Inclusive education isn't dead, it just smells funny. Routledge.

Stalmach, A., D'Elia, P., Di Sano, S., & Casale, G. (2023). Digital learning and self-regulation in students with special educational needs: A systematic review of current research and future directions. Education Sciences, 13(10), Article 1051. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101051

Wehmeyer, M. (2022). Self-determined learning, personalizable education, and strengths-based approaches to educating all learners. Focus on Exceptional Children, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.17161/foec.v47i1.18627

Wheeler, M. (2026). When classroom coping conceals educational need: A multiple-case analysis of hidden barriers to participation. Educationalfutures, 17(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1830274

Wu, J., & Yu, X. (2025). The influence of formative assessment on academic performance: Exploring the role of teachers' emotional support. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1567615. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1567615

Zandvakili, E., & Gordon, E. W. (2025). Transforming educational assessment: Implementing equitable and inclusive strategies. In Socioculturally responsive assessment (pp. 99–112). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003435105-7

Downloads

Published

2026-09-25

How to Cite

Benoit, S., & Benoit, M. A. (2026). Flexible Pathways to Demonstrating Learning: British Columbia Online Educators’ Perspectives on Inclusive Assessment Practice. E-Learning Innovations Journal, 4(2), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.57125/ELIJ.2026.09.25.03